Litigation Report May 2026

Lateral Market Intelligence · Litigation

Q2 2025 through Q2 2026 · 5,000+ Tracked Moves

Practice FocusLitigation
Dataset5,000+ Tracked Moves
PeriodQ2 2025 – Q2 2026
PublishedMay 2026

By the Numbers

Litigation is the most active lateral practice area in the market. More than 5,000 attorney moves were tracked from Q2 2025 through the early weeks of Q2 2026—nearly double the activity seen in corporate and five times the volume in banking. The market spans a wide spectrum of firms, from high-volume insurance defense and commercial defense shops to elite trial and white collar practices, each with distinct hiring patterns and candidate profiles.

5,000+Total Lateral Moves Tracked
3,113Changed Title With Move
62.3%Title Change Rate
741Moved to Judicial, Government or Non-Firm
896Changed Practice Area
2,352Peak Quarter (2025 Q3)

The 62.3% title change rate is notably higher than corporate (47.5%) or banking (43.1%). This reflects two factors unique to litigation: the large volume of judicial clerks entering the associate market for the first time, and a broader range of title structures across the litigation firm spectrum—from boutiques to high-volume defense shops—that create natural title shifts even in lateral-to-lateral moves.

Firms Moving Together

Litigation produced the largest single-month group moves of any practice area in the dataset. High-volume defense firms dominated group hiring, consolidating attorney headcount through large monthly intake events rather than steady trickle hiring. Elite trial and white collar firms also made notable concentrated hires at the Am Law level.

Notable Group Moves

Kirkland & Ellis — September 2025: The largest single-month group move across all three practice areas tracked. 31 litigation attorneys joined Kirkland in one month, drawn from a broad range of Am Law and regional firms.

Wilson, Elser — October 2025: 28 attorneys joined, continuing the firm's pattern of large-scale monthly intake as it expanded its national commercial defense platform.

Gordon & Rees — September 2025: 22 attorneys joined in a single month, followed by another group of 21 in January 2026—one of the few firms with back-to-back large group moves across consecutive quarters.

Crowell & Moring — August 2025: 20 attorneys joined, reflecting a push into commercial and government litigation capacity ahead of the Q1 2026 peak.

Lewis Brisbois — October 2025: 20 attorneys joined in a concentrated October intake, consistent with the firm's national expansion strategy across insurance and commercial defense.

Davis Polk — October 2025: 18 attorneys joined, representing one of the largest Am Law white collar and securities litigation group moves of the period.

Who Got a New Title

The Law Clerk → Associate transition is the defining title move in litigation, with 1,095 attorneys making that transition during the period. This reflects the annual judicial clerkship cycle—one of the primary pipelines into litigation practice at Am Law firms. The reverse flow (Associate → Law Clerk) is also notable at 378, representing attorneys who chose to clerk after beginning their careers in private practice.

Most Common Title Transitions

Law ClerkAssociate1,095
AssociateLaw Clerk378
AssociateAttorney (In-House)276
AttorneyAssociate206
AssociateCounsel99
AssociateSenior Counsel89
AssociateSenior Associate81
AssociateOf Counsel59
AssociatePartner44
Asst District AttorneyAssociate24

Green = promotion · Gold = in-house or role shift · Red = title reduction (often reflects firm titling conventions, clerkship rotations, or intentional career moves)

Judicial, Government & In-House

741 litigation attorneys moved to non-law-firm positions during the tracked period—by far the highest non-firm exit rate of any practice area. Litigation's pipeline into judicial clerkships, government service, and public interest work is a structural feature of the practice that has no equivalent in transactional law.

394Moved to Judicial Positions
196Moved In-House
101Moved to Government

Top Government Destinations

U.S. Attorney's Office
18
U.S. Dept of Justice
11
CA Dept of Justice
5
NY Attorney General
4
Brooklyn DA's Office
3
MA Attorney General
2
City of Chicago Law
2

Top In-House Destinations

Amazon
4
Apple
3
Citi
3
AbbVie
2
Airbnb
2
Anduril Industries
2
DraftKings
2
Merck
2

The judicial destination data reflects a full year of clerkship cycles—U.S. District Courts and Courts of Appeals absorbed the majority of outgoing attorneys, with the Second and Ninth Circuits leading. The U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ remain the top government destinations, consistent with the government enforcement environment that has kept white collar demand high throughout the period.

When Attorneys Move

The class year distribution in litigation is broader than in corporate or banking, with meaningful movement extending from the class of 2014 all the way through 2024. This reflects litigation's longer career arc—partners and senior counsel remain active in the lateral market well into their careers, and the practice's specialist nature means experience accumulates value over a longer runway than in transactional work.

Class of 2023
1,162
Class of 2024
1,056
Class of 2022
957
Class of 2021
819
Class of 2020
669
Class of 2019
518
Class of 2018
366
Class of 2017
297
Class of 2016
226
Class of 2015
156
Key Insight

The class of 2024 appearing as the second most active cohort is unique to litigation and reflects the judicial clerkship pipeline. Many 2024 graduates clerked for a year and are now entering the associate market—a pattern that inflates the most recent class year figures compared to corporate or banking, where clerking is far less common.

What Practitioners Work On—and What They Pick Up

Commercial litigation is the anchor specialty of the market, appearing more frequently than any other in both arrival and departure profiles. Insurance defense, investigations, and product liability round out the most active sub-specialties. The post-move specialty data reveals where firms are actively building capacity: arbitration, insurance, labor and employment, and construction all saw significant increases as newly acquired specialties following a lateral move.

Top Specialties at Arrival Firms

Commercial 2,005 Appellate 530 Insurance 519 Arbitration 517 Investigations 510 Construction 484 Labor & Employment 445 Product Liability 462 Personal Injury 417 Professional Liability 391 Government 372 Class Action 320 Health Care 252 Securities 251

New Specialties Picked Up After Move

Commercial +433 Arbitration +231 Insurance +224 Labor & Employment +169 Construction +167 Personal Injury +163 Product Liability +155 Professional Liability +138 Appellate +136 Government +125 Investigations +112

Arbitration as a newly acquired specialty stands out. 231 attorneys added arbitration to their profile after moving—reflecting both firm-level demand for international and domestic arbitration capacity and the growing prevalence of arbitration clauses in commercial contracts that is pushing dispute work outside of court. Health care litigation also grew meaningfully as a post-move specialty, consistent with the enforcement and regulatory scrutiny driving disputes in that sector.

Where People Moved From and To

New York leads both departure and arrival volume, but litigation shows the most geographically distributed activity of any practice area in the dataset. Washington DC, California, Texas, and Florida all represent substantial markets with distinct demand profiles—DC driven by government enforcement and regulatory litigation, California by consumer class actions and tech disputes, Texas and Florida by commercial and insurance defense work.

Top Departure Cities

New York
885
Washington DC
368
Chicago
250
Los Angeles
250
Houston
156
San Francisco
148
Dallas
133
Philadelphia
116
Atlanta
112
Boston
98

Top Arrival Cities

New York
901
Washington DC
436
Los Angeles
311
Chicago
272
Houston
182
San Francisco
165
Dallas
154
Philadelphia
139
Atlanta
124
Boston
105

Washington DC is a net receiver of litigation attorneys, with 302 arrivals versus 176 departures shown in the location data—a significant positive flow driven by government enforcement work, regulatory litigation, and the concentration of appellate practices in the capital. Los Angeles also gained ground relative to its departure volume, reflecting California's expanding role as a litigation hub for consumer, tech, and entertainment disputes.

When the Market Moved

Q3 2025 was the most active quarter in the litigation dataset by a substantial margin—2,352 moves in a single quarter. This is the highest single-quarter figure across all three practice areas tracked and reflects the convergence of the annual judicial clerkship cycle ending in summer, large group moves at multiple firms, and sustained associate-level demand throughout the period.

2025 Q2 919 Partial Period Partners: 22
Counsel: 35
Associates: 799
Other: 63
2025 Q3 2,352 Peak Quarter Partners: 35
Counsel: 87
Associates: 2,083
Other: 147
2025 Q4 1,785 Full Quarter Partners: 28
Counsel: 64
Associates: 1,597
Other: 96
2026 Q1 1,548 Full Quarter Partners: 34
Counsel: 90
Associates: 1,287
Other: 137
2026 Q2 366 Partial Period Partners: 10
Counsel: 24
Associates: 312
Other: 20

Unlike corporate and banking where Q1 is the peak quarter, litigation peaks in Q3—driven primarily by the judicial clerkship cycle. Law clerks typically begin their clerkships in August and complete them in July of the following year, meaning July through September produces a concentrated wave of clerks entering private practice as new associates. Firms that want access to this pipeline need to be making offers in the spring and early summer, well before Q3 activity materializes.

Who Hired Most

The litigation hiring landscape spans two distinct tiers. High-volume insurance defense and commercial defense firms—Wilson Elser, Gordon & Rees, Lewis Brisbois—lead in raw headcount, operating national platforms that absorb large numbers of associates across many markets simultaneously. The second tier consists of elite Am Law trial and white collar practices where volume is lower but the profile of candidates is significantly different.

Who Hired Most

Wilson, Elser
126
Gordon & Rees
125
Lewis Brisbois
106
Kirkland & Ellis
88
Latham & Watkins
42
Gibson, Dunn
42
Quinn Emanuel
40
Quintairos Prieto
39
Cooley
38
Wood, Smith, Henning
37
Davis Polk
35
Greenberg Traurig
35
Paul, Weiss
31

Litigation Open Positions

261 active litigation associate openings are currently in the market. The geographic distribution of open roles in litigation differs notably from corporate and banking—Los Angeles leads all cities, reflecting California's outsized share of consumer, tech, and entertainment dispute work. Commercial litigation remains the dominant specialty in demand across the board.

261Active Litigation Openings
3–5Years Experience Most Requested
12+Markets With Active Roles

Top Firms Hiring Litigation Associates

Wilson, Elser
55
Kirkland & Ellis
18
Lewis Brisbois
17
Greenberg Traurig
16
Duane Morris
8
Akerman
8
Ballard Spahr
7
Latham & Watkins
6
Troutman Pepper
6
Nelson Mullins
5

Top Cities for Litigation Openings

Los Angeles
30
New York City
19
San Francisco
15
Miami
14
Washington DC
13
Chicago
10
Philadelphia
10
Dallas
8
Atlanta
8
Houston
7

Litigation Specialties in Active Demand

Commercial 60 Transportation 14 Construction 11 Appellate 6 Product Liability / Toxic Torts 6 Data Privacy / Class Action 4 Cyber / Government / Investigations 4 Commercial / Class Action 3 Health Care 2 Unfair Competition 3

Wilson Elser's dominance of the open position list—55 open roles, more than three times the next firm—reflects the scale of its national build-out and its operating model of absorbing large volumes of associates across multiple markets simultaneously. For candidates at elite Am Law platforms, the more relevant hiring signal is Kirkland, Greenberg Traurig, Latham, and Gibson Dunn, which are all actively filling roles with a significantly different candidate profile in mind. Los Angeles leading all cities in open positions is a meaningful data point—California's litigation market is generating more active hiring demand than New York right now, driven by consumer class actions, tech disputes, and entertainment litigation.

What the Movement Tells Us

Litigation is the largest and most structurally complex lateral market of any practice area. The 5,000+ moves tracked in this period represent a market operating at full capacity across multiple distinct segments—high-volume defense, Am Law trial, white collar, appellate, and plaintiff-side practices each with their own hiring cycles, candidate profiles, and geographic concentrations.

The Q3 seasonality is the most important planning insight in the litigation data. Unlike corporate and banking, where Q1 is the peak, litigation peaks in Q3 because the judicial clerkship cycle ends in summer. The 2,352 moves recorded in Q3 2025 represent an annual pattern that repeats predictably. Firms that want access to top clerk talent need to recruit during spring and make offers before the summer, not in response to Q3 movement that has already happened.

The Law Clerk → Associate pipeline—1,095 attorneys—is a defining feature of litigation talent that has no parallel in transactional practice. Clerks emerging from federal district courts and circuit courts carry an analytical rigor and judicial exposure that firms actively value. The competition for clerks from top courts is intense, and the firms that win that competition tend to be the ones with established judicial clerkship programs and strong relationships with the bench.

The government and judicial exit rate in litigation (741 total) is also worth understanding clearly. These are not attorneys leaving the profession—many will return to private practice after their government stints with significant courtroom experience and institutional relationships that make them more valuable, not less. Firms that maintain relationships with alumni in government roles and judicial chambers are better positioned to benefit from that re-entry pipeline.

Commercial litigation's dominance in specialty data reflects the breadth of the practice—nearly every business dispute of consequence ends up in this category. The faster-growing specialties post-move tell a more forward-looking story: arbitration demand is rising as parties seek to keep disputes out of an increasingly congested court system; data privacy and class action work is growing as state privacy laws proliferate; and construction litigation is expanding in markets with significant infrastructure and development activity.

For candidates, litigation offers the most geographically distributed opportunity set of any practice area. Los Angeles, Washington DC, Chicago, and Houston all represent genuine alternative hubs with meaningful volume and firm presence. Attorneys in secondary markets have more realistic pathways to strong platforms than their counterparts in corporate or banking, where New York concentration is far more pronounced. The open position data reinforces this—Los Angeles leads all cities in active litigation roles right now, making the case that the best opportunity may not always be where the most movement historically originated.

Erin Ryce